The promise of cloud native applications lies in their ability to provide enhanced agility, scalability, and resilience, perfectly aligning with the digital transformation needs of today’s enterprises. However, as we navigate this transformation, cloud native application security is often surrounded by myths and misconceptions. Understanding these myths and how they are being addressed is crucial for organizations to secure their environments effectively.
In this blog post, we will discuss some of the top myths surrounding cloud native security, providing clarity on the complexities and best practices for securing modern applications in the cloud.
Myth 1: Focusing Solely on Application Code Ensures Security
Securing cloud native applications requires more than just analyzing application code for vulnerabilities. Tools like Static and Dynamic Application Security Testing (SAST and DAST) and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) are vital but only part of the solution. True security addresses broader challenges, such as container images executing unauthorized commands at runtime, Kubernetes misconfigurations like open API access, and cloud account misconfigurations that expose critical services. A holistic approach ensures security at every layer, from code to infrastructure to runtime.
Reality: While securing application code is vital, it is only one aspect of comprehensive cloud native security. Security must also encompass infrastructure, configurations, and access controls.
- Holistic Security Approach: Implementing a holistic security strategy that includes infrastructure-as-code, configuration management, and robust access controls.
- Security in DevOps: Integrate security practices throughout the DevOps pipeline to ensure all components of the environment are secured, not just the application code.
Myth 2: Image Scanning and Agentless Workload Scanning Guarantee Compliance
Pre-production image scanning and agentless workload scanning are valuable for identifying vulnerabilities, but they are not sufficient for ensuring compliance alone. Comprehensive compliance necessitates a multifaceted strategy, incorporating runtime security monitoring, automatic compliance checks, and, when necessary, the use of agents. This provides deep visibility and control over application behavior in production environments.
Reality: While these tools are important for identifying vulnerabilities, they are only part of a broader compliance strategy. Compliance requires continuous monitoring and adherence to regulatory requirements across the entire lifecycle.
- Continuous Compliance Monitoring: Utilizing tools that provide continuous compliance monitoring and reporting to ensure adherence to regulatory standards.
- Comprehensive Security Posture: Developing a comprehensive security posture that includes vulnerability management, configuration management, and real-time threat detection.
Myth 3: Runtime Security is Disruptive
Viewing runtime security solely as a mechanism to block attacks overlooks its broader aspects, such as detection, monitoring, and prevention. An effective runtime security strategy balances blocking with detection and monitoring capabilities. By leveraging advanced technologies, organizations can minimize disruption while proactively identifying and mitigating threats, thus enhancing overall security posture without significantly impacting operational efficiency.
Reality: Effective runtime security can be implemented in a way that does not disrupt operations. Advanced runtime security solutions are designed to be unobtrusive while providing critical protection.
- Non-Intrusive Security Tools: Leveraging non-intrusive kernel-level technology that monitors and protects workloads without impacting performance.
- Real-Time Threat Detection: Implementing real-time threat detection engine that is sensitive enough to identify real threats that could compromise business operations, but smart enough not to trigger a cascade of false positives.
Myth 4: The Cloud Provider Bears Sole Responsibility for Security
Relying solely on the cloud provider for security ignores the shared responsibility model, where customers also play a significant role. Understanding and adhering to this model is vital for maintaining robust security in cloud-based systems. This approach ensures that both the cloud infrastructure and the data and applications it hosts are well-protected, thereby reducing the risk of security breaches and ensuring comprehensive protection.
Reality: Cloud providers operate on a shared responsibility model. They secure the infrastructure, but customers are responsible for securing their applications, data, and configurations.
- Understanding Shared Responsibility: Educating organizations about their responsibilities in the shared responsibility model.
- Implementing Security Best Practices: Adopting security best practices for managing applications and data within cloud environments.
Myth 5: Container Orchestration Tools Automatically Secure
Although container orchestration tools come with built-in security features, relying solely on them for security is misguided. Securing containerized environments requires a thorough approach that includes vulnerability scanning, runtime monitoring, and access management, in addition to the security features provided by container orchestration tools. This comprehensive approach ensures that containerized applications are protected against a wide range of security threats.
Reality: Container orchestration tools provide powerful management capabilities but do not automatically secure the environments they manage.
- Security Configuration: Ensuring that container orchestration tools are configured securely, including network policies, role-based access controls (RBAC), and pod security policies.
- Additional Security Layers: Implementing additional security layers such as service meshes, and security scanners specifically designed for container environments.
Myth 6: Vulnerabilities are Only Exploited in Production
Believing that vulnerabilities are only exploited in production environments undermines the importance of proactive vulnerability management throughout the software development lifecycle. By identifying and addressing vulnerabilities early, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of security breaches and minimize potential impacts on production systems. This proactive approach enhances overall security and resilience against threats.
Reality: Vulnerabilities can be exploited at any stage, including development and testing, not just in production.
- Shift-Left Security: Promoting the shift-left approach, where security is integrated into the development process from the beginning, ensuring vulnerabilities are identified and addressed early.
- Continuous Testing: Implementing continuous security testing throughout the software development lifecycle to detect and mitigate vulnerabilities before they reach production.
By addressing these myths through education, specialized tools, and best practices, organizations can better secure their cloud native environments and leverage the full potential of cloud native technologies.
Conclusion
Debunking myths about cloud native security is the first step towards comprehensive security for cloud native applications. Understanding the realities of cloud native security and adopting a comprehensive strategy that addresses the unique challenges of these modern architectures are essential to effectively mitigate risks and safeguard assets in the cloud. When organizations embrace cloud native security best practices, they not only enhance their security posture but also foster innovation and operational efficiency, positioning themselves for success in an increasingly digital world.
Dive deeper into cloud native security myths !
Get your copy of the Debunking the Top Nine Cloud Native Security MythseBook
